Monday, September 17 |
07:00 - 08:45 |
Breakfast ↓ Breakfast is served daily between 7 and 9am in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |
08:45 - 09:00 |
Introduction and Welcome by BIRS Staff ↓ A brief introduction to BIRS with important logistical information, technology instruction, and opportunity for participants to ask questions. (TCPL 201) |
09:00 - 09:45 |
Alexander Vishik: The notion of anisotropy taken to the limit ↓ The importance of the notion of anisotropy was noticed for quite a while, most notably, in the theory of quadratic forms. I will discuss the “anisotropic motivic category” which embodies this notion. This category introduced originally with the aim of studying the Picard group of Voevodsky's category appeared to have many interesting and unexpected connections. (TCPL 201) |
10:00 - 10:45 |
Olivier Haution: Involutions and the algebraic cobordism ring ↓ We discuss relations between the geometry of a smooth
projective variety equipped with an involution and the geometry of its
fixed locus, using Chern numbers. (TCPL 201) |
10:45 - 11:05 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
11:05 - 11:50 |
Mathieu Florence: Lifting Witt vector bundles ↓ Let p be a prime number, and let S be a scheme of characteristic p>0.
For any integer n>1, one can build the scheme of Witt vectors of length n of S, denoted by Wn(S). It is a natural thickening of characteristic pn of S.
Let us say "Wn-bundle" (or Witt vector bundle if n is understood) for "vector bundle over Wn(S)".
In this talk, we consider the following Question.
Let V be a vector bundle over S.
Q(n,V): Does V extend to a Wn-bundle?
I will first give precise (hopefully elementary) definitions, and basic properties of Witt vector bundles. I will then show that the answer to question Q is positive,
when V is the tautological vector bundle of the projective space of a vector bundle, defined over an affine base. I will discuss counterexamples in the general setting -- in a Galois-theoretic way.
If time permits, I plan to discuss the main motivation for raising question Q: lifting Galois representations.
This is joint work, with Charles De Clercq and Giancarlo Lucchini Arteche. (TCPL 201) |
11:50 - 12:05 |
Group Photo ↓ Meet in foyer of TCPL to participate in the BIRS group photo. The photograph will be taken outdoors, so dress appropriately for the weather. Please don't be late, or you might not be in the official group photo! (TCPL 201) |
12:05 - 13:30 |
Lunch ↓ Lunch is served daily between 11:30am and 1:30pm in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |
14:00 - 15:00 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
15:00 - 15:45 |
Skip Garibaldi: Generically free representations ↓ The 2007 determination of the essential dimension of spin groups over the complex numbers exploited knowledge of which representations of algebraic groups are generically free, showing the value of proving an analogue of that classification for algebraically closed fields of prime characteristic. Changing the characteristic adds extra complications because the representation theory is more complicated and also because generic stabilizers need not be smooth. In a series of joint papers with Bob Guralnick and Ross Lawther, we have determined the generic stabilizers for all irreducible representations of simple algebraic groups. This work has applications to essential dimension, to proving the existence of a stabilizer in general position, and to determining rings of invariants. (TCPL 201) |
16:00 - 16:45 |
Philippe Gille: Semi-simple groups that are quasi-split over a tamely-ramified extension ↓ Let K be a discretly henselian field whose residue field is
separably closed. Answering a question raised by G. Prasad, we show that a
semisimple K-group G is quasi-split if and only if it quasi–splits after
a finite tamely ramified extension of K. (TCPL 201) |
17:00 - 17:45 |
Igor Rapinchuk: Algebraic groups with good reduction and unramified cohomology ↓ Let G be an absolutely almost simple algebraic group over a field K, which we assume to be equipped with a natural set V of discrete valuations. In this talk, our focus will be on the K-forms of G that have good reduction at all v in V . When K is the fraction field of a Dedekind domain, a similar question was considered by G. Harder; the case where K=Q and V is the set of all p-adic places was analyzed in detail by B.H. Gross and B. Conrad. I will discuss several emerging results in the higher-dimensional situation, where K is the function field k(C) of a smooth geometrically irreducible curve C over a number field k, or even an arbitrary finitely generated field. These problems turn out to be closely related to finiteness properties of unramified cohomology, and I will present available results over various classes of fields. I will also highlight some connections with other questions involving the genus of G (i.e., the set of isomorphism classes of K-forms of G having the same isomorphism classes of maximal K-tori as G), Hasse principles, etc. The talk will be based in part on joint work with V. Chernousov and A. Rapinchuk. (TCPL 201) |
17:45 - 19:30 |
Dinner ↓ A buffet dinner is served daily between 5:30pm and 7:30pm in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |