Tuesday, December 5 |
07:00 - 08:45 |
Breakfast (Vistas Dining Room) |
09:00 - 09:10 |
Thierry Duchesne: Wit, Insight, and Matters of Great Importance (TCPL 201) |
09:10 - 09:55 |
Peter Craigmile: Regional climate model assessment via spatio-temporal modeling ↓ In order to adapt to a changing climate, policymakers need information about what to expect for the climate
system. Typically local information about certain aspects of the climate system comes from regional climate models
as well as from observational records. A regional climate model is a downscaled global circulation model, a
mathematical model that describes, using partial differential equations, the temporal evolution of climate, oceans,
atmosphere, ice, and land-use processes over a gridded spatial domain of interest. An important problem is understand
how well regional models can reproduce observed climate variables.
Using two motivating analyses based on data from the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, I will discuss
different spatio-temporal modeling strategies that can be used to assess regional climate models using observational
data. I will also outline the associated statistical and computational challenges in building hierarchical models
using data sources with varying spatial and temporal support. My intention is to motivate a dialogue about the broader
challenges underlying spatio-temporal climate model assessment.
This talk is based on joint research with Peter Guttorp and Veronica Berrocal. (TCPL 201) |
09:55 - 10:05 |
Devan Becker: discussant (TCPL 201) |
10:15 - 10:45 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
10:45 - 11:30 |
Murali Haran: A projection-based approach for spatial generalized linear mixed models ↓ Non-Gaussian spatial data arise in a number of disciplines. Examples include spatial data on disease
incidences (counts), and satellite images of ice sheets (presence-absence). Spatial generalized linear mixed models
(SGLMMs), which build on latent Gaussian processes or Gaussian Markov random fields, are convenient and flexible
models for such data and are used widely in mainstream statistics and other disciplines. For high-dimensional data,
SGLMMs present significant computational challenges due to the large number of dependent spatial random effects.
Furthermore, spatial confounding makes the regression coefficients challenging to interpret. I will discuss
projection-based approaches that reparameterize and reduce the number of random effects in SGLMMs, thereby
improving the efficiency of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms for inference. Our approach also addresses
spatial confounding issues. This talk is based on joint work with Yawen Guan (SAMSI) and John Hughes (U of
Colorado-Denver). (TCPL 201) |
11:30 - 11:40 |
Jean-François Coeurjolly: Discussant (TCPL 201) |
11:50 - 12:00 |
Thierry Duchesne: Interesting and important stuff (TCPL 201) |
12:00 - 13:15 |
Lunch (Vistas Dining Room) |
13:15 - 13:30 |
Group Photo ↓ Meet in foyer of TCPL to participate in the BIRS group photo. The photograph will be taken outdoors, so dress appropriately for the weather. Please don't be late, or you might not be in the official group photo! (TCPL Foyer) |
13:30 - 14:15 |
Rajarshi Guhaniyogi: Distributed Spatial Kriging: Scalable Bayesian Framework for Massive Spatially Indexed Datasets ↓ Advances in geo-spatial technologies have created data-rich environments which provide extraordinary
opportunities to understand the complexity of large and spatially indexed data with rich and complex spatial models.
Spatial process models for analyzing geostatistical data often entail computations that become prohibitive as the
number of spatial locations becomes large. We propose a divide-and-conquer strategy within the Bayesian paradigm to
achieve massive scalability for spatial process models. We partition the data into subsets, implement a Bayesian
spatial process model to analyze data in each subset and then obtain approximate posterior inference for the entire
dataset by optimally combining the individual posterior distributions from each subset. Importantly, we offer full
posterior predictive inference on the residual spatial surface as well as on the outcome at arbitrary locations, and
full posterior inference on model parameters. We call this approach ``Distributed Kriging" (DISK). The approach has
the major advantage of employing embarrasingly parallel computation and not having to store the entire data in one
processor, this leads to massive scalability. Though the framework is general in nature and essentially applicable
to any spatial model, the present article carefully demonstrate its performance with the stationary Gaussian process
model and nonstationary modified predictive process model. The approach is intuitive, easy to implement and leads
to accurate characterization of spatial processes with massive datasets. Moreover, the present article rigorously
develops theoretical results justifying optimal performance of the proposed approach. We further illustrate its
significantly superior inferential and predictive ability in comparison with the state-of-the-art competitors using
different simulation experiments and a geostatistical analysis of the Pacific Ocean sea surface temperature data. (TCPL 201) |
14:15 - 14:25 |
Ben Taylor: Discussant (TCPL 201) |
14:45 - 15:15 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
15:15 - 16:00 |
Theresa Smith: Challenges in modelling geolocated health data ↓ Gaussian Cox process (LGCPs) are a type of inhomogeneous Poisson point process where the log intensity surface is a GP. A point process approach is useful when each observation is indexed to a particular point in space and time. This is in contrast to the common area-level approach in epidemiology wherein observations and risk factors are summarised over several small regions (e.g., counties or local authorities). The spatially-continuous approach inherent in LGCPs naturally accommodates risk factors measured on different spatio-temporal units and avoids some forms of ecological bias. However, we still face many computational and interpretation issues with these models.
In this talk I compare maximum likelihood and Bayesian techniques for estimating systematic trends in the spatio-temporal risk surface as well as the latent GP and discuss the strengths and weakness of the existing computational tools for fitting LGCPs. Finally I will use a spatio-temporal LGCP to investigate the roles of environmental and socio-economic risk-factors in the incidence of campylobacter (a common bacterial case of food borne disease) in the UK. (TCPL 201) |
16:00 - 16:10 |
Katie Wilson: Discussant (TCPL 201) |
16:30 - 16:50 |
Thierry Duchesne: Insight, Wit and Matters of Great Importance (TCPL 201) |
17:30 - 19:30 |
Dinner (Vistas Dining Room) |