10:30 - 11:30 |
Max Lieblich: Derived equivalences of varieties and Torelli-type questions for derived categories and Chow theory ↓ This is a report on joint work with Martin Olsson. I will review the basic results on equivalences of the derived categories of coherent sheaves on smooth projective varieties and discuss some attempts to use them to produce Torelli theorems in positive characteristic.
Derived equivalences between two varieties always give correspondences between the two varieties in many cohomology theories. In particular, in characteristic 0, one can link them to Hodge theory and rephrase Torelli theorems in terms of a package made of the derived category and the Chow theory. This leads one to wonder if a similar thing happens in positive characteristic. For K3 surfaces, we have a complete answer to this question (that I will explain). Among other things, this has a strong relationship to the Tate conjecture. I will finish with some open questions. (TCPL 201) |
15:30 - 16:30 |
David Rydh: Compact generation of derived categories of stacks ↓ I will give a survey over recent results on derived categories of algebraic stacks with an emphasis on compact generation.
In a loose sense, compact objects in the derived category is a replacement for ample line bundles on projective schemes. They also generalize vector bundles but are more flexible. From a different perspective, compact objects are like the coherent sheaves among the quasi-coherent sheaves.
I will focus on three questions:
(1) When are perfect complexes compact?
(2) When is the derived category compactly generated?
(3) When are complexes of quasi-coherent sheaves good enough?
For schemes, these questions are well understood by work of Thomason, Neeman, Bokstedt, Bondal, Van den Bergh and Lipman. For stacks, the picture is not complete yet but there are satisfactory partial results by Ben-Zvi, Francis, Nadler, Toen, Antieau, Gepner, Lurie, Drinfeld, Gaitsgory, Hall, Neeman and the speaker. (TCPL 201) |
16:30 - 17:30 |
Jack Hall: The Telescope conjecture for algebraic stacks ↓ Let T be a triangulated category. A basic question is the classification of the triangulated subcategories of T. The interest in this question stemmed from the work of Hopkins who connected it to the Telescope conjecture in algebraic topology. Over the last two decades, spurred by work of Neeman, there has been interest in this from the perspective of algebraic geometry. Most recently, this has been considered by Antieau, Stevenson, Balmer-Favi and Dubey-Mallick. I will discuss some recent work with Rydh that allows us to classify subcategories in the equivariant setting and, more generally, for stacks. (TCPL 201) |